Myopic risk-seeking: The impact of narrow decision bracketing on lottery play
نویسندگان
چکیده
In two experiments conducted with low-income participants, we find that individuals are more likely to buy state lottery tickets when they make several purchase decisions one-at-a-time, i.e. myopically, than when they make one decision about how many tickets to purchase. These results extend earlier findings showing that “broad bracketing” of decisions encourages behavior consistent with expected value maximization. Additionally, the results suggest that the combination of myopic decision making and the “peanuts effect”—greater risk seeking for low stakes than high stakes gambles—can help explain the popularity of state lotteries.
منابع مشابه
Loving a Bad Bet 1 Loving a Bad Bet: Factors That Induce Low-income Individuals to Purchase State Lottery Tickets
Playing the state lottery is clearly inconsistent with expected value maximization; lotteries only return approximately 50 cents on the dollar, on average. Moreover, low-income individuals spend a higher percentage of their income, and possibly even a higher absolute amount, on lottery tickets than do wealthier individuals. However, little research has explored what factors encourage or discour...
متن کاملMyopic Prospect Theory vs. Myopic Loss Aversion: How General Is the Phenomenon?
Individuals often act myopically when they evaluate sequences of investment opportunities. For a loss averse decision maker, such myopia causes the sequence to look less attractive and might result in the rejection of an investment program that would have been accepted in less myopic view (Benartzi and Thaler, 1995). In this paper, we argue that the relation between myopia and the attractivenes...
متن کاملBROAD BRACKETING INDUCES UTILITARIAN DECISIONS 1 Broad Bracketing Induces Utilitarian Consumer Decisions
In this digital age, over 2 billion people are making increasingly important financial and health decisions on digital interfaces of computers and mobile devices. Yet we know people fail to have enough self-control to resist temptations time and time again. How can we help people make better decisions in a digital environment? We hypothesize that using broad bracketing to present decisions will...
متن کاملThreat affects risk preferences in movement decision making
Emotional states such as sadness, anger, and threat have been shown to play a critical role in decision-making processes. Here we addressed the question of whether risk preferences are influenced by postural threat and whether this influence generalizes across motor tasks. We examined risk attitudes in the context of arm-reaching (ARM) and whole-body (WB) leaning movements, expecting that incre...
متن کاملA Test of Narrow Framing and its Origin
I provide a test of narrow framing to explain why individuals turn down small positive expected value lotteries. Participants in a large survey have been asked whether they would accept a small lottery of winning 180 euros with probability of 1/2 or losing 100 euros with the same probability. To half of the sample, randomly selected, the lottery question was asked at the beginning of the interv...
متن کامل